top of page

Giving Feedback on PGR Writing

This interactive workshop provides research supervisors with practical strategies to give effective feedback on PGR writing. It explores key characteristics of effective feedback and gives supervisors tools to enhance their supervisory practice.

Learning objectives

Giving Feedback on PGR Writing

By the end of this workshop, research supervisors will be able to:

  • Identify the key characteristics of effective feedback and apply them in practice.

  • Implement tools such as feedback expectation forms and cover letters to enhance clarity and focus in the feedback process.

  • Encourage independence and critical thinking in PGRs by using reflective and collaborative feedback approaches.

Theme

Writing and Feedback

Format

Workshop

Online

Duration

60 minutes

Supervisor level

All levels

Session outline

Workshop outline

  1. Ineffective vs effective feedback: analysis of examples

  2. Characteristics of effective feedback (progressive, tailored, specific, timely, promotes independence)

  3. Using Feedback Tools: Feedback Expectation and Tool Feedback Cover Letters


Schedule for 1 hour workshop

  • 2 minutes: Welcome and introduction to the session’s objectives.

  • 10 minutes: Examples of ineffective and effective feedback, including asking

  • participants to add to the chat and picking these comments up.

  • 20 minutes: Characteristics of effective feedback

  • 15 minutes (minimum): Case study - this includes breakout room (10 mins) and

  • discussion (5 mins).

  • 10 minutes: Top 5 effective feedback strategies, rating confidence level, and closing remarks


Case Studies

For this workshop, we have included five case studies designed to align with the characteristics of effective feedback.


List of case studies

  • Case Study 1: Overwhelmed by supervisor feedback (tailored feedback or promoting independence)

  • Case Study 2: Balancing feedback and independence (promoting independence)

  • Case Study 3: Developing writing skills (specific and actionable feedback)

  • Case Study 4: Delayed Feedback (timely feedback)

  • Case Study 5: Supporting an underperforming candidate (tailored feedback)


How to use the case studies

Feel free to choose from the case studies provided and decide which ones to include. Each case study comes with two slides:

  • The first slide outlines the case study with accompanying discussion questions to guide supervisors in reflecting on the scenario.

  • The second slide presents follow-up key takeaways.


Resource developer log

Dr Roisin Astell, University of York

Date resource last updated:

06/03/25

Facilitator reflections

This is a paragraph about your business. Let your visitors know who you are, what you do and what your website is all about. Double click on the text box to edit the text and add all the information you want to share.

Resources for use in delivery

Slide deck

Facilitators notes

Questions document


bottom of page